Would you describe the ONE as "dead boring" or as "universal intelligence"?
"Universal" (overall) sounds quite good. But intelligent? The only thing the ONE has to do is to BE. That's easy. Endlessly easy. You don't have to be intelligent in order to just BE. You can't go wrong. But "universal stupidity" actually doesn't sound convincing. Anyway the ONE is terribly boring. Nothing happens. Only stupid oneness, bliss, peace and freedom. Dead boring! Nothing is going on. I'm going to look for another ONE... Joking apart: There is no definition and no imagination of the ONE. What actually should be the difference between "emptiness", "fullness", "universal intelligence" or "dead boring"? I don't see one. These are just words. You can also say: the ONE is "french fries". It's just as well. All there is, is the ONE.
Is emptiness the real essence of form?
If mind can't classify the term "emptiness" (or "silence") then we are on the right path. Every word mind can't classify is appropriate to describe the "real character of form". Then, mind doesn't pay any attention any more to the "real character of form" and the questions will disappear. I would like to summarize the "real character of form" that way: Form arises from the ONE, form vanishes into the ONE, form IS the ONE.
Is love the link between form (fullness) and emptiness?
Love is (impersonal) knowing that there is no need for a link between form (fullness) and emptiness.
What is an appearance in the consciousness?
Imagine there are just appearances but no one to whom they appear. They don't belong to anybody. They are not "my" or "your" or anyone's appearances. They simply happen. Without any reason. Without a creator. Just like that. Apparently. It can be thoughts, objects, human beings, natural spirits or whatever. Imagine there isn't any appearance IN the consciousness but consciousness ITSELF IS the appearance. It plays the game of "appear and disappear" with the asking person. And the person itself is the appearance too, appearing and disappearing out of you, the Being. Timeless and space-less.
You say: everything is without any reason, without any sense. There is nothing to do and nothing to meditate on etc. Could you explain to me please, why you, Karl Renz, Eckhart Tolle, Samarpan, Toni Parsons etc. give satsang, write books, coach earnest people and why we should send our children to school?
You can't do anything that turns you into something you already ARE. It's like the picture of the ->glasses. I don't care if you meditate, write books, give satsang, teach children or send them to school, help poor people, make war, pray, watch a soccer match etc. It's what appears. In other words, they are manifestations happening inside what you really are. Apparently happening. The person who asks questions and thinks that he or she has a free will, ALWAYS acts in a perfect way, even if they believe that they don't. Perhaps they will be writing books because they are talented and enjoy writing. Or they think that they have to write books because it is expected from them. Or because they feel they have an urgent need to write. There are billions of influences (->conditioning), which make a person act. The person has no influence on what kind of acts will appear. The film is already shot.
In the beginning this concept is pure horror for a person who believes in having a free will. Perhaps they might say: "But I can make new decisions in every single moment about what I'm going to do next. I can change and get to be a better person." Yes. Maybe, maybe not. That's inside the script too. The perfect script.
Surprisingly this concept carries inside itself something unbelievably liberating for a person. The fear of death of the person (= belief in a separate ME) quickly decreases. Acceptance appears that nothing can be done and the person disappears. And suddenly there is only happiness without cause. The ONE. Suddenly there is clarity (but for no one any more) that all is ONE. And there is no more need for concepts and imaginations.
